Our title actually concerns a pair of revolutions, one early in 1917 and the other toward the end of the year, both for the same causes: the country’s political leadership and economic stability.
The events are difficult to narrate in a linear fashion because, often, the causes and effects themselves are not linear, to say nothing of the fact that dating the events is challenging for the different calendars used at the time.
Furthermore, the terminology used has a different meaning in Russian than their English interpretation.
For these reasons and others, we start our dissertation of these historical events with a glossary; a roadmap of sorts to help navigate the remains of what was, fundamentally, an impressive struggle.
The Russian Revolution: Terms and Conditions
First, we’ll settle the calendar issue: Julian versus Gregorian?
The Gregorian calendar presents a much more even breakdown of the months; all save February have either 30 or 31 days.
The Julian calendar, on the other hand, alternates between 29 and 31 days and February presents its own leap year variations; that month might have 23 or 24 days.
Why is this important?
Unlike most of Europe and, for some purposes, Great Britain, Russia was using the Julian calendar almost exclusively at the time of the revolution.
The trouble lies in assuming every event recorded in Russian history on any given date must reflect the Julian date rather than including the possibility that the Gregorian date had in fact been used, especially in when events in Russia are contrasted with global events.
Currently and at the time of the Russian Revolution, the Julian calendar runs 13 days behind the Gregorian calendar.
That discrepancy could lead to some confusion over the sequence of events. That is why historians denote any date relating to Russian history with either O.S. or N.S. to indicate which calendar should be consulted when considering exactly what happened and when.
We will follow that protocol in this text.
Terminology of the Russian Revolution
Soviet: literally means council in Russian
Bolshevik: translated from Russian as one of the majority; Bolsheviks were also known as Reds
Mensheviks, by contrast, were the political minorities
the Duma: the Lower house of the legislative assembly
Petrograd: St. Petersburg
at the time of the revolution, it was the capital of Russia
However, by the Second World War, the seat of government had moved further inland, to Moscow.
Architects of the Revolution
These are the principal engineers of the Russian Revolution:
Karl Marx: philosopher and political theorist whose writings inspired Lenin, among others
Vladimir Lenin: leader of the Bolsheviks and creator of the Marxist-Leninist political ideology
Leon Trotsky: Marxist and Bolshevik, though as the revolution was gaining traction, he was a Menshevik
Julius Martov: a Menshevik who stirred Lenin’s ire by suggesting peace with Germany
it was his writings that formed the basis of the Trotsky’s manifesto
Grigory Zinoviev: a staunch supporter of Lenin, he was, along with Trotsky and Stalin, one of the seven original members of the Politburo.
To this illustrious list, we should add Nicolai Ruzsky, the army general who forced Tsar Nicholas’ abdication.
Of course, we all know that Tsar Nicholas was the last Russian emperor and his abdication signalled the end of the Romanov dynasty.
His role in the revolution is our starting point, now that we have all of the groundwork laid.
Find out about online history classes here.
The First 1917 Russian Revolution
No event in history is freestanding: there are always causes leading up to and fallout – be it social, political, economic or a combination of all three.
Russia’s February Revolution (March 1917 N.S.) was instigated by the 1905 Revolution and the root cause of both actions was Tsar Nicholas II.
The crux of the 1905 event was Bloody Sunday, when the palace imperial guards fired upon unarmed factory workers approaching the Winter Palace to submit a petition for their emperor to intercede on their behalf.
They were asking for better working conditions but were murdered instead!
This incident had several effects; among others, it served to deepen social unrest and distrust of the Tsar, as well as stirring up political fervor.
It is important to note that the Tsar was not in residence at the time.
He had been informed of the workers’ demonstration and ordered troop reinforcements to the palace ahead of their arrival. He did not command the palace guards to open fire on the supplicants; nevertheless, he was blamed for the massacre.
This incident cemented the idea that Nicholas II was at least cowardly if not ineffective, a sentiment carried through the world war, especially as Russia suffered staggering losses.
During World War I, Russia herself was in turmoil, not only for the casualties sustained in battle but because, on the home front, people were starving – and the Tsar was to blame!
Flash forward now to 1917...
The Tsar had been overseeing the front lines of the war for two years.
As the socio-economic crisis deepened in Petrograd, the State Duma advised their emperor to establish a constitutional monarchy, at least to see the country through this period of unrest. He ignored the advice and any bit of loyalty to him that the people may have harboured evaporated.
Further demonstrations led to more bloodshed, with police firing on demonstrators... before siding with their cause and actually joining them. Other regiments, some in the city on the Tsar’s orders, also mutinied.
Member of the Soviet and the Duma quickly formed a provisional government in an effort to restore order. Their first official act was to demand the abdication of the tsar.
On March 15, 1917 (N.S.), Tsar Nicholas II abdicated, naming his brother, Michael, to the throne. Wisely, that Duke deferred ascension until the people could vote on whether to continue the monarchy or institute a government by the constitutional assembly.
That move, while lauded, left a vacuum in the country’s governance: leadership was up for grabs.
The same could not be said for the American colonies; they resented England's leadership, which led to the American Revolution.
The Interim Months and The Bolshevik Revolution
Upon Duke Michael’s deferment of the crown, the Duma maintained the hastily formed provisional government, but it catered mainly to the wishes of the aristocracy.
In other words: the people still had no champion at the national level and no relief from the hardships of daily life.
Unlike their former enemy, where a certain Herr Hitler would become the people's champion in Nazi Germany.
The socialist Soviets worked hard on behalf of the people and even earned the loyalty of left-leaning urbanites, but they were under constant pressure from the Bolsheviks, who were seeking a road into – or, at least a way of swaying the Duma to their agenda.
Lenin led the movement that demanded an immediate cessation of hostilities with Germany, an end to serfdom – those who worked the land should have ownership of it, and an adequate food supply for all.
The government wanted to continue fighting the war, which gave the Bolsheviks all the justification they could have hoped for to escalate their revolutionary tactics.
The workers who had previously demonstrated without any real direction were whipped into a militia and aimed at insurrection.
On November 7th, 1917 (N.S.) The Red Guards, as they were called, violently overthrew the provisional government and rendered all political power onto the Soviets, with the Bolsheviks as the supreme reigning political party.
Find out about the battle of Waterloo here.
The Aftermath of the Russian Revolution
The Bolsheviks, led by Lenin, moved the seat of national government to Moscow where, in one of its first official acts, it drafted and signed the Treaty of Brest-Litvosk with Germany (March 1918), thus ending their involvement in the First World War.
Making good on that promise earned the Bolsheviks a lot of goodwill and faith from their war-weary constituents.
Unfortunately, one treaty does not make peace on all fronts. Several political factions within Russia were dissatisfied with Bolshevik rule.
The Whites were counter-revolutionaries who rather wanted the bourgeois system to be reinstated. The non-Bolshevik socialists resented all of the power the Bolsheviks accorded themselves in the Brest-Litvosk treaty.
And then, there were independent movements espousing the breakup of the nation into smaller nation-states, out from under Bolshevik control.
The Bolsheviks and their Red Army – formerly the Red Guard, by now well-regimented and well-equipped, was able to put down all of these skirmishes, in the process rebranding themselves as the Communist party.
Their withdrawal from the world stage into communism served to shield the country from the ravages brought on by the Great Depression.
What happened with Tsar Nicholas and his family?
After being refused exile in England, where Nicholas believed he might find a sympathetic royal court, he and his family were relocated several times; the last move being to Yekaterinburg.
Around 2:00 in the morning on July 17th, 1918, the entire family was awakened, given time to dress, ushered into the basement of their residence and executed.
Historians cannot seem to agree on who gave the actual order for this tragedy but Lenin is strongly thought to have commanded it.
How discover more earth-shattering events that changed our world's political and economic landscape.
The platform that connects tutors and students